News

False Claims Act: Payment vs. Participation Regulations

  • Oct 19 2012

In U.S. ex rel. Williams v. Renal Care Group, Inc. (Case No. 11-5779) (October 5, 2012), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States on two main False Claims Act (FCA) claims relating to Medicare reimbursement of dialysis supplies. In doing so, the Court issued an important decision distinguishing the applicability of the FCA between noncompliance with payment and participation regulations.

The United States alleged, inter alia, that defendants violated the FCA by submitting claims which they knew were not in compliance with DME supplier standards set forth by statute and regulation relating to conditions of participation (i.e. to honor warranties, fill orders, and maintain an appropriate place of business), which impose independent sanctions and potential exclusion.

The Sixth Circuit reasoned that “[t]he False Claims Act is not a vehicle to police technical compliance with complex federal regulations.” As such, the Court agreed with the defendants that noncompliance with participation regulations does not render a claim materially false, irrespective of the whether the regulation is violated, because payment is not expressly or impliedly conditioned upon compliance with participation conditions.

This decision could have a further relevance in the context of Medicare and Medicaid provider audits for improper payments. In opposing audit tactics, our firm has always maintained that disallowances based on noncompliance with conditions of participation are unwarranted and inconsistent with the structure and purposes of the Medicare and Medicaid program. This decision adds support and justification to the validity of this argument in suggesting that payment is not expressly or impliedly conditioned upon compliance with participation conditions.

This post is contributed by Charles Dunham


Tagged with: , , , , , ,

Posted in: Uncategorized

Locations

The culture of teamwork and collaboration at O’Connell and Aronowitz helps our office locations assist clients in a myriad of legal disciplines and harness the talents of O’Connell and Aronowitz attorneys across New York State. We offer the experience, resources, and skills to help you protect your rights and your best interests.

Albany

54 State Street
Albany, NY 12207

tel: 518.462.5601
fax: 518.462.2670


Saratoga Springs

1 Court Street
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866

tel: 518.584.5205
fax: 518.584.5441